Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Virology ; 36(2):165-169, 2020.
Article in Chinese | GIM | ID: covidwho-1975404

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus in China (2019-nCoV) has spread to all 31 provinces in China and more than 24 countries in the world. The cure criterion was based on the negative results with respiratory specimens in real-time reverse transcription polymerise chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays with an interval of 24 hrs. This report describes the controversial viral nucleic acid test in 27 cases after hospitalization for medical treatment for various periods. Of 27 cases, 6 cases showed positive results for fecal specimen, and 2 cases showed negative results with respiratory secretion but positive with fecal specimen. In summary, the consistence of results of nucleic acid test with different type of specimens from patients infected with 2019-nCoV varied, deeper research is needed to reveal the criteria of nucleic acid detection during different stages of the 2019-nCoV infection.

2.
Chinese Journal of Virology ; 36(4):554-559, 2020.
Article in Chinese | GIM | ID: covidwho-1408664

ABSTRACT

Detection of the nucleic acids (NAs) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the "gold standard" for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Antibody detection in serum is an important auxiliary method. We undertook retrospective analyses of the results of NA detection and antibody detection in the diagnosis, treatment and isolation of COVID-19 patients at the beginning of the disease as well as upon discharge from hospital. We offered a preliminary discussion on the correlation between NA detection and antibody detection and the infectious factors of COVID-19. Our study can provide a reference for monitoring SARS -CoV-2 infection in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with COVID-19.

3.
Int J Med Sci ; 17(9): 1142-1146, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-602628

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyze the blood test indicators of patients after infection of COVID-19 in Chongqing and analyze the clinical indicators of 8 patients with diarrhea. Materials and Methods: From January 26, 2019 to February 13, 2020, 70 patients diagnosed with 2019-nCoV according to the World Health Organization interim guidance for NCP and divided into diarrhea and non-diarrhea groups. The laboratory tests liver and kidney function, blood routine, coagulation function, and immune status. Results: The study population included 70 hospitalized patients with confirmed CONV-2019. NCP patients (43males and 27 females) with a mean age of 48.57±17.80 (9~82) years and only 4.3% of patients have lung-related diseases. The positive rate of ESR, CRP, PT, IL6, lymphocyte count, GGT, Prealbumin and CD4 was more than 50%. We further analyzed the differences between 8 diarrhea patients and 62 non-diarrhea patients. Among these indicators, only Lymphocyte, CRP, Prealbumin and Cystatin C positive rate is more than 50%. Although there is no statistical difference in GGT, 100% of the 7 patients tested decreased. Conclusion: Our data recommended that the ESR, CRP, PT, IL6, lymphocyte count, GGT, prealbumin and CD4 have important value in the diagnosis of COVID-19, and the decrease of GGT may be an important indicator for judging the intestinal dysfunction of patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , gamma-Glutamyltransferase/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19 , Child , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Diarrhea/blood , Diarrhea/virology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 98(1): 115109, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-593503

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 has caused COVID-19 pandemic globally in the beginning of 2020, and qualitative real-time RT-PCR has become the gold standard in diagnosis. As SARSCoV-2 with strong transmissibility and pathogenicity, it has become a professional consensus that clinical samples from suspected patients should be heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 min before further processing. However, previous studies on the effect of inactivation on qualitative real-time RT-PCR were conducted with diluted samples rather than clinical samples. The aim of this study was to investigate whether heat inactivation on clinical samples before detection will affect the accuracy of qualitative real-time RT-PCR detection. All 46 throat swab samples from 46 confirmed inpatients were detected by qualitative real-time RT-PCR directly, as well as after heat inactivation. Heat-Inactivation has significantly influenced the qualitative detection results on clinical samples, especially weakly positive samples. The results indicate the urgency to establish a more suitable protocol for COVID-19 clinical sample's inactivation.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Virus Inactivation , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Hot Temperature , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL